With public figures, the personal gestures can unsettle

In 1978,  I was covering Republican U. S. Senator Ed Brooke’s reelection campaign for the Boston Phoenix.  Both on primary and election day,  I was glued to him. Where he went, I went.  Sometimes it was meet-and-greets with  people. Sometimes it was consultations with staff.  The possibility of defeat hung in the air, but he was philosophical.  There wasn’t much left for him to do to affect the outcome.  So we went out for lunch.                                        

Brooke had been going through a nasty divorce, and the Globe had found contradictory statements he had made about $49,000 he had borrowed, mostly from his mother-in-law and some from a supporter. There were other hints of financial messiness, but, still, the man had been a great Senator, a real leader on civil rights, women’s rights, and subsidized housing. He was the first Republican to call for Richard Nixon’s resignation after the Saturday Night Massacre. Deep down I hoped Brooke would win reelection.                                                   

For lunch we went to the Union Oyster House and sat at the raw bar.  I had a cup of clam chowder, and he had either oysters or cherry stones.  And the fellow shucking the delicacy kept them coming and coming, well beyond the number on the menu.    There was something a little slithery about Brooke’s ease at accepting the largesse, and it made me very uncomfortable…as if it were, in a small way, emblematic of something larger.                                                                                   

Fast forward to 2012 and the Elizabeth Warren campaign.  I recently went to a house party for supporters.  Warren was not taking questions directly from the crowd, which I considered a big mistake.  Worse, written questions had to be crammed onto a 3” square Post-It.  When Warren had finished her powerful formal presentation, someone brought to the microphone a straw basket with people’s Post-It questions.  Well, I thought, at least she was drawing at random.  First. Second. Third.   But then, no, she picked one up, didn’t like it,  put it back and took another.  A small gesture, but unsettling.                                                                                                                                                                                                    Like the fleeting moment with Ed Brooke, I thought, Warren’s tiny gesture seemed to speak to something larger.  In Warren’s case, it spoke to naivete, amateurism, first-time candidatitis.  It prompted the very same queasiness that even some of her strongest supporters have felt around her mishandling of  questions about her Cherokee heritage.                                                                                                                                                  Yesterday’s Globe wrote at length about the timing of Warren’s statements about her Native American roots. Much of the timeline was clarified.  But then there was the caption under her photo, noting she had “acknowledged she had told Harvard and Penn that she was Native American. When the issue first surfaced, Warren said she only learned Harvard was claiming her as a minority when she first read it in the Boston Herald.”  Both could be true.  She might have told them but not known that they had used the information in diversity filings until she read it in the Herald. But, as the Washington Post notes today, the optics of the back and forth are all wrong.                                                                                                                                                        Scott Brown continues playing this for all he can. Polls show the public is not yet being swayed by the story.  But Warren needs a decisive victory in tomorrow’s Democratic state convention to rekindle the enthusiasm among party faithful that she sparked from her emergence as a candidate until the Cherokee story broke a month ago.  Maybe then the media will focus on the larger issues facing us all, and what the candidates can do to address them.                                                                                                                                                                                                             I’d greatly appreciate your thoughts in the comments section below.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Media, Politics and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to With public figures, the personal gestures can unsettle

  1. C R Krieger says:

    1)  I thought the Democratif Party Machine made a mistake bringout out the Three Line Whip to ensuure Ms Marisa DeFranco wasn’t on the Ballot in September.  While unlikely, Professor Warren could implode.  My example, if you fly light single engine aircraft you should always be looking arouund for a place to land, just in case.
    2)  I think it is first-timeitis.  As someone noted to me, Scott Brown had been vetted at the local, State Rep and State Senate level before he went big time. I think that Ms Warren missed a chance to turn this around and say that affirmative action has its place and can even help a place like Harvard.  Own it, rather than deny it.  Made her look like an affirmative action denying Republican.
    Regards  —  Cliff

    Like

  2. aronsbarron says:

    While I consider myself something of a “grammar nazi,” I’m always pleased that you take the time to write, and I’ve never been put off by your typing or spelling.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s