Obama and the politics of gay marriage

It would have been easier for Barack Obama to wait until after the election to announce that he thinks gays should have the right to marry.  He could have let people assume that V.P. Joe Biden’s and Education Secretary Arne Duncan’s comments to that effect were a hint that such was the thinking inside the Administration. When Obama was running for the Illinois State Senate in 1996,  a candidate questionnaire said he supported gay marriage.  His people now say that the questionnaire was filled out by someone else.  Jeez.

Back to now. President Obama didn’t have to jeopardize his standing in his 2012 reelection bid, especially in the swing states.  My conversations with some gays after Biden’s Sunday comment suggest that they understood the difficulties the issue presents him electorally and, while disappointed in Obama’s slowness on the issue, they still wanted to ensure his reelection.  They are thrilled, of course, though nervous about the political fallout.

Much is at stake here. Evangelicals and other Christian conservatives were never going to vote for him, so there’s nothing lost there. Obama’s “evolved” position is, however,  at odds with the views of many African-Americans, but it’s hardly likely that they will abandon him in the election.  The question there is: will they show up at the polls?  Hispanics have been overwhelmingly for Obama, with Republicans trying to figure out a way to tap their increasingly significant slice of the electorate.  This may help the GOP somewhat, but Hispanic voters remain more affected by the candidates’ positions on immigration than their views on gay marriage. 

Polls put people’s support for gays’ right to marry at around 52 percent, while older people are far more opposed and younger people favor it by a two-to-one margin.  Older people can be depended upon to vote, not so much the younger voters.  Will this now energize them to get engaged, as they were four years ago?

What we won’t know until November is how middle-of-the-roaders in swing states will be affected by this announcement, coming six months before the election. My guess is that the main debate will continue to be about jobs and the economy and a range of budget decisions, including changes in Medicare and the health system. 

I was puzzled about why Obama, if he views this as a civil rights issue, wouldn’t support action at the federal level. I asked Barney Frank, who replied that marriage has traditionally been a matter reserved for the states, except when the Supreme Court intervenes, as it did with interracial marriage.  The only Congressional intervention has been a negative, the Defense of Marriage Act (DoMA), which Bill Clinton signed into law. The GOP 2012 platform seeks to have DoMA enshrined as an amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

In dramatic contrast, Obama directed the Justice Department not to enforce DoMA, which he deems unconstitutional. He also did away with“don’t ask, don’t tell” and  now is the first President to support gay marriage.  He gets credit for taking a political risk and standing up for a principle.  That much is clear. By November, given the emphasis on the economy, it may not matter one way or the other.

I’d greatly appreciate your thoughts in the comments section below.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Culture, Politics and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Obama and the politics of gay marriage

  1. Christian Avard says:

    *** By November, given the emphasis on the economy, it may not matter one way or the other. ***

    I agree 100%. Economic growth has been very slow. So has job growth. That’s what keeping Mitt Romney alive in this election.

    Like

  2. C R Krieger says:

    OK, so the most interesting piece of this will be how Blacks, and the Black Churches, will respond.  Otherwise it is ancient history by November.  The half-life of a political memory in the US is 90 days.

    Buy, given this sift in sexual mores, why are we still firing military officers for adultery?  I understand that twice in a row the Skipper of the USS COWPENS was relieved for this.  I think it is a righteous canning, both times, but where is the sweet spot on our governmental imposition of morality?

    Back to same-sex marriage, yes, it was a good idea on the President’s part to get this out of the way now.  And the ball is now in Romney’s court.  His best move is to say it is a state level issue.

    Regards  —  Cliff

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s