Bathroom bill looms in Massachusetts

from L.A. Times

from L.A. Times

I have a friend. Let’s call her Suzannah.  She is over six feet tall, blue-eyed, platinum hair in a page boy. Terrific set of gams, as my father would say.  She’s married to a smart and talented guy.  But here’s a problem.  It’s the bathroom law, currently in effect in North Carolina and Georgia and under consideration elsewhere.  In the name of religious freedom, such laws hold that you can only use public facilities that match the sex on your birth certificate.  But Suzannah was born Stephen. So what’s a transgender woman to do?

Then there’s Chuck, a big burly guy with red hair and beard, usually garbed in jeans, work boots and red and black plaid flannel shirt. Chuck was born Cheryl.  So where’s he going to pee? Will the women welcome him in the ladies’ room?

The issue of a bathroom law proposal hasn’t directly hit Massachusetts, first in the nation to sanction gay marriage. But there is a pending transgender accommodation bill, which  bans discrimination in public places based on gender identity. It would cover public restrooms, restaurants, shopping centers and other public places.

It would seem pretty simple to be adding gender identity to race, gender, religion, sexual preference as reasons not to discriminate. Alas, there’s nothing simple about this debate, which has engendered (pun intended) the most loathesome vitriol imaginable, including rants from former Red Sox hero Curt Schilling.

Governor Charlie Baker is taking hits from the LGBT community and got booed off the stage at a recent networking event because he hasn’t signed on to the pending anti-discrimination legislation, which passed the state Senate and awaits action in the House. He said he hasn’t taken a position because there’s no bill yet. He’s getting beaten up in the media for that.

He could have said he supports the concept but wants to see the specific language of a bill that lands on his desk. He might have avoided this firestorm. After all, 17 other states have passed such laws. Baker himself has been a supporter of gay rights, including gay marriage, and tapped a gay legislator as his running mate in his first bid for the corner office. He’s been pro LGB, and I suspect he’ll get with the “T” part of the program if the bill hits his desk.

Still,  his foot dragging suggests that Baker may have his eye on higher office down the road.  Happily, for now, he’s well to the left of the national GOP.  I’d hate to think that Potomac Fever might do to Charlie Baker what it did to Mitt Romney as soon as Romney moved his personal belongings into the governor’s office.

I welcome your comments in the section below. To be alerted when a new blog is posted, click on “Follow’ in the lower right portion of your screen.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Culture, Politics, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Bathroom bill looms in Massachusetts

  1. Hop Holmberg says:

    Amazing how focusing on the White House causes one to lose the perspective that led to success.

    Like

  2. Mike Rice says:

    I don’t know what to think these days other than mankind being in real trouble.

    Like

  3. Sam Rothman says:

    Marjorie – Adding a bit more facts to this discussion. IF your friend Suzanna or Chuck were in NC and had their gender reassignment surgery, they would have also got their birth certificates changed. So Suzanna can pee in women’s room and Chuck can shower in mens.

    I am copying the link and statute below.

    I am a bit shocked of what Obama administration is advocating – they want people to make the choice of which restroom/ shower facilities they use, without comiting to that gender without the surgery. I find this gender fluidity concerning.
    This is every teen boy’s dream come true, or for that matter every male imate’s fantasy.

    LINK AND STATUTE.

    http://www.lambdalegal.org/know-your-rights/transgender/changing-birth-certificate-sex-designations

    Statute: N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 130A-118(b)(4), (e) (2005).

    Text: (b) A new certificate of birth shall be made by the State Registrar when . . .

    (4) A written request from an individual is received by the State Registrar to change the sex on that individual’s birth record because of sex reassignment surgery, if the request is accompanied by a notarized statement from the physician who performed the sex reassignment surgery or from a physician licensed to practice medicine who has examined the individual and can certify that the person has undergone sex reassignment surgery.

    Summary: North Carolina will issue a birth certificate reflecting the proper sex.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s