Cry the beloved city! Reflections on the Newton teachers strike

The City of Newton’s shameful, illegal, and history-making 11-day teachers strike is over. Finally, Newton’s 12,000 school kids are back in class, where they belong. Those of us who have lived in Newton for a long time are heartbroken that the dispute came down to that illegal action. The turbulence and incivility, the willingness to damage our children, are not what we have a right to expect from our teachers and elected officials.

The self-inflicted lacerations are deep, and it will take time to poultice the infection and heal the open wounds.

Back in the Paleolithic era, when I was a student, Newton High School (there was only one) was one of the top ten high schools in the country. The notion of “the Garden City” was not just about growing green lawns and daffodils. It was about nurturing young minds, bringing youngsters to their full potential. Folks moved to the city just for its public school system.

Many newcomers with kids still come for the same reason. How disheartening the experiences of the past weeks have been. How damaging to the reputation of our beloved city. The full extent of those damages is yet to be measured. The strike is over, but many questions remain, and it’s hard to sort out the winners and losers.

The teachers got a 12.6 percent increase over four years, expanded parental leave, higher pay for paraprofessionals, and more social workers in the elementary schools, a total package of $53 million over four years.  Most of the issues were worked out early in the process. Teachers’ pay was the most challenging issue, and the union held out for an historic 11 days. What they gained in the end was virtually the same as what the School Committee provided in its last offer before the strike. Did this make the NTA winners?

Initially, there was much sympathy for the issues raised by the Newton Teachers Association. But, as the days passed, the union didn’t fare that well in public opinion. Was it really necessary to call in the big guns of the Mass Teachers Association (MTA), with its militant tactics, to further the MTA’s goals of building statewide support for legalizing teacher strikes and lowering MCAS scores necessary for graduation? (Today the legislature shuffled the strike legalization bill off to committee “for study,” which probably means it’s dead for this year.) Adding insult to injury, the performance stridency of the official from the National Education Association was hardly helpful to the tone at the bargaining table.  To what extent did our local teachers permit themselves to be used as pawns in some larger labor union strategy masquerading as concern for Newton students?

As the strike wore on and on and on, the most poignant losers were the kids. Daily the damage grew and grew, especially for special ed, disabled, Metco, ESL students and all their families. Struggling families were sent scurrying for day care and substitute activities for their young ones. Many parents lost income when those were not available. Some parents went to court and tried, unsuccessfully, to get the teachers to return to the classrooms to protect the students while the bargaining continued.

The growing frustration spawned a class action lawsuit against the union. For the parties at the bargaining table, the 4-year contract may now be a wrap. But, for those wounded by the obduracy of the warring parties, the injuries endure, and the motion seeking compensatory (and possibly punitive) damages is still out there.

Between 1100 and 1200 children, from some 600 families, have already been moved to private schools due to NPS handling of COVID.  Now there are new rumblings about how the strike has motivated other parents to look for private school alternatives. I have also heard that there is fresh interest in creating a public charter school here. If the school population shrinks measurably again, this could necessitate the closing of one or more of the smaller elementary schools. Will our new school superintendent, who started her job with such great promise, have to deal with these additional hits? And will the teachers resent her though she kept her eyes on what was important educationally and the fiscal decisions were not hers to make.

Mayor Ruthanne Fuller certainly didn’t fare well in this process. People keep asking why she didn’t come to the bargaining table until the 11th hour, and then just once?  Fuller says she was working closely with the superintendent and the school committee throughout the nightmarish process, and NSC chair Chris Brezski and others confirm that. People close to the bargaining praise her stand-up role, despite being vilified, and her willingness to add more money as it became available throughout the nearly 17-month process. But people’s sense of her lack of transparency, using shifting and contradictory numbers dating back to the defeat of the operating override she advocated last spring, is an issue. The fallout for Fuller may not be known until the fall of 2025 if she runs for reelection.

Frustration grew among all the parties. The negative rhetoric coming out of union leaders after agreement was reached was gratuitous and quite disheartening. Their slowness to move boldly toward reconciliation signals the prospects for more ill will going forward.

It shouldn’t have taken the Newton Teachers Association and the School Committee 16 fruitless months to find ways to meet legitimate needs of the school system. It definitely should should not have taken an historically long and illegal strike to reach an agreement. Not in Newton.

Pity the students who had been locked out by COVID and now found themselves locked out again. Pity the members of the School Committee, increasingly reviled by the union but performing this public service because they care about Newton’s kids. Pity the taxpayers who must pick up the direct and indirect costs of the strike; even if the Judge permits some of the fines for the illegal strike to be paid to the City instead of the state, there is still a significant shortfall. And, yes, pity the talented front-line teachers, top professionals entrusted with the care and development of our most precious resource, who did deserve more money and greater respect from the larger community, a place where many of them cannot even afford to live – and thereby become a more integral part of the city’s fabric. 

When things are working well, we all benefit from the success of their efforts. It’s hard not to think that, in Newton, in this round, all parties have lost. It is a very sad day.

I welcome your feedback in the comments section on the home page. To be alerted when a new blog is posted,  look for “Follow’ in the upper right portion of the home page, enter your email and click on subscribe.

15 thoughts on “Cry the beloved city! Reflections on the Newton teachers strike

  1. Eric P Finamore's avatar Eric P Finamore

    Is this journalism? Must we be the lucky recipients of Ms. Arons-Barron’s gratuitous Monday-morning quarterbacking just because we have kids in the NPS? Yes, there is blame enough to go around. Tell us something we don’t know. We are living through it. Constructive suggestions, perhaps? Don’t just spin your wheels for the attention. Why would “Parents for Newton’s Kids” broadcast this rant?

    Like

      1. Eric P Finamore's avatar Eric P Finamore

        I apologize for the snarky tone of my comment, but your comment came to me in an e-mail from Parents for Newton’s Kids, parentsfornewtonskids-gmail.com@shared1.ccsend.com, associated with a group called KidsFirstNewton.com, who seems to be using your post to promulgate their anti-union agenda.

        Yes, the strike was illegal. But educators are underpaid nationally, and the crisis in American public education – the unwillingness to devote resources to it – threatens American democracy. If we can’t attract quality educators to public schools, equality of opportunity is diminished. Teachers need to be paid wages that are competitive, not just with other school districts, but with the private sector to which they will be attracted otherwise.

        Mayor Fuller’s performance throughout the strike was shameful. She used her public appearances to express her obvious contempt for the teachers and scorn for anyone who questioned her motives or efforts, and by all reports she was absent from almost all of the negotiating sessions. This is not leadership.

        I agree with you that the entire episode was a disaster, and that better efforts have to be made on both sides to avoid this from happening again. However, the Mayor and the School Committee had more than a year to address these issues and decided not to do so, apparently wanting to walk the NTA to the precipice, thinking they would not dare to strike. Their tactics backfired. Their maladministration of the City government is to blame. Newton teachers are hardworking, dedicated professionals who deserve better.

        Like

  2. James E Epstein's avatar James E Epstein

    The public school “workers” are only a very small subset of all “the taxpayers [being] the owners” and unions do not belong in any publicly owned enterprise.

    Like

    1. jonangel's avatar jonangel

      James, yes, teachers are only a “small subset”, but that doesn’t detract from a right to a voice and who knows how many others agree with them?

      I’d have to ask just why, unions “do not belong in any publicly owned enterprise”? You seem to forget such businesses are owned by the people.

      But none of this should detract from a workers RIGHT to
      withdraw their labour.

      Like

      1. Dean Xerras's avatar Dean Xerras

        Actually in the USA, in this particular case, these workers 100% do NOT have that right, and DID not, when they striked. It was, is, and will always be, illegal, for teachers to strike. (To the tune of $600,000 in fines payable to the court holding them in contempt for the illegal strike, and possibly close to another $1 million in compensatory penalties to the city where they striked).

        Like

      2. jonangel's avatar jonangel

        In a country that has made it illegal for a worker to withdraw their labour, I’d suggest to claim to be a Democracy is a joke.
        The thought that the average American supports such legislation disgusts me. Can this be true?

        Like

      3. Dean's avatar Dean

        In this country I guess we just value a child’s constitutional right to an education more than we do a laborer’s (public servant teacher, in this case) right to strike. Just like we make it illegal for healthcare workers to strike. No joke here. And yes, quite true. And you know ZERO about this situation as you said, so best to stay out of the discussion.

        Like

      4. jonangel's avatar jonangel

        Dean, so you have the right to determine the rights of one over the rights of another?
        You want your children to be taught by those who in your opinion have no rights?
        Tell me, why shouldn’t “a health worker” have the right to withdraw their labour?
        Based on your comment, you don’t respect even you own rights, Welcome to the brave new world, I hope your children agree with you.

        Like

  3. James E Epstein's avatar James E Epstein

    What jonangel says may have applicability to private industry, but never to the public sector where the taxpayers are the owners.

    Like

    1. jonangel's avatar jonangel

      James, surely the workers are “the taxpayers and the owners”. What is the difference between working for government, or a publicly owned “private industry”?

      Like

  4. jonangel's avatar jonangel

    I know nothing about this particular industrial dispute, but have a firm view on industrial action (strikes). It should be the RIGHT of all workers to withdraw their labour if discussions are deadlocked.

    Commerce/industry can raise it’s prices any time it wants to (no discussion needed), maybe that should be made illegal as well?

    I cannot speak for other than Australia, but here teachers are being asked to perform the role of parents, the things my parents taught me, we now expect our teachers to cover.

    I repeat, the right to strike, should not b illegal.

    Like

    1. zairameneses's avatar zairameneses

      From the reflection shared by Ms. Barron, I understand that her point is not about the strike. The lack of transparency and how poorly the Mayor’s office solves problems is what needs to change.

      Like

      1. jonangel's avatar jonangel

        Having read the article once again, I am of the view that 90% of the content relates to the teachers, the pay rise, the union and the PTA. Yes, both “transparency” and the “Mayors office’ got a mention, but they were not at the forefront of the article.
        But I return to the fact that workers have (having tried other means) the RIGHT to withdraw their labour.

        Like

Leave a Reply to jonangel Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *